There are a lot of methods in considering a research method, if it is good or not. These are the following:
1.Define and articulate a research question (formulate a research hypothesis)
2.Identify possible sources of information in many types and formats
3.Judge the scope of the project
4.Reevaluate the research question based on the nature and extent of information available and the parameters of the research project.
5.Select the most appropriate investigative methods (surveys, interviews, experiments) and research tools (periodical indexes, databases, Web sites)
6.Plan the research project
7.Retrieve information using a variety of methods (draw on a repetoire of skills)
8.Refine the search strategy as necessary
9.Write and organize useful notes and keep track of sources
10.Evaluate sources using appropriate criteria
11.Synthesize, analyze, and integrate information sources and prior knowledge
12.Revise hypothesis as necessary
13.Use information effectively for a specific purpose
14.Understand such issues as plagiarism, ownership of information (implications of copyright to some extent), and costs of information
15.Cite properly and give credit for sources of ideas
Reference:
http://library.georgetown.edu/reference/infolit.htm
How do you know if a piece of research work is good or not? how are they evaluated?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
From what I have read from this article, this implies of how to integrate a good research work. It illustrates the conventions or guidelines to achieve a better research paper. This also good that the author cited some guidelines to understand how get into a good research paper. On the other hand, still it doesn't satisfied the given question.
as i could observed., ur standard deals more in research contents.,
this is such a good guide to the researchers..
best regardz!
your topic will serve as a good guide for those who are painstakingly having their research.
Post a Comment